Product Review: Jergens Natural Glow Express »
By leily on May 25, 2008 in Beauty | 0 Comments
Reviewer: S.K.Y.
Brand: Jergens
Name: Natural Glow Express Body Moisturizer
Size: 120 mL
Price: $9.99 CAD / $7.99 USD
Shade Tried: Medium/Tan
In my continued attempt to hide my hideously white & scarred legs I’m trying this new product. Things I always look for in a self-tanner: whether it works, leaves any streaks or splotches, and if the results are a natural and looking tan.
From Jergens’ website: “Jergens natural glow express Body Moisturizer is the quick way to a natural-looking summer glow. With this breakthrough moisturizer you will begin to see colour after the first use. When used daily you will get more than a full shade of natural summer colour in just three days.””
To Purr About:
- very sweet scent, but not as chemically as other skin tinting moisturizers/products that I’ve tried
- noticeable tanning in 1 day
- does not irritate my extremely sensitive skin
- reasonably priced
Claws Out:
- may leave streaks if you’re not careful – probably not the best for evening tan lines unless you’re a pro at application techniques
- scent is very strong & lasts very long
- a bit on the sticky/syrupy side
Final Comments:
I guess there’s a fine balance with everything - this product is VERY effective in giving you colour, but therefore leads to streaking if you’re not careful in applying it. The sweet scent is a bit strong for me, BUT since I got such amazing results in such little time I don’t have to put up with the smell for more than the prescribed 3 days. I was very impressed by the noticeable and quick results of this product – I’m not dark tanned, but it’s a major difference between my pasty white legs & my nice medium tone now. I’ll probably have to use it once a week to upkeep the nice looking tan, but it’s totally worth it.
Update: after a few days of not using the daily tinting moisturizer to upkeep my tan as suggested – I have very streaky legs. Hmmmm…..I can’t hold this against the product because it did what it said it would do, but I wanted to make a note of it.
Rating (out of 5):
If you have a product that you’ve tried and would like to write a review, send me an email! Details on how to submit a review can be found in the left-hand sidebar.
image: jergens.ca
Popularity: 4% [?]
Liv, I have mixed feelings about the leggings. Methinks it’s time to pack them away. Fishnets would have looked good.
Two lovebirds. Lindsay and her BFF Samantha Ronson. I have close female friends but I never nuzzle them. Well not like that.
Don’t bend over or we will get an eyeful. Where’s a pair of Lindsay Lohan brand leggings when you need ‘em?
Milla Jovovich, Katie Holmes, Suri? Nope. It’s Marcia Cross!
Gwen, Gavin and Kingston. If she has a girl, will she name her Marley?
There’s her O face. O for Oscar that is! Julia Roberts and her baby, Henry.
Kat Von D. Those shoes look way comfy.
Charlize Theron, another gorgeous, genetically blessed woman.
Look, I love Dita like all the other glamoristas but that skirt looks like baseball stitching.
Celine Dion with a full size Marie Osmond porcelein doll.
Colon exam?
Gynecological exam?
Its hospital chic! Leave it to an Olsen to head out in public in a robe and scrubs.
Love the bag that Ashlee Simpson is carrying. Perfect for hiding that baby bump.
Ummm….not sure about the dress. But since its Natalie Portman, she can do no wrong. Her dresses for the Cannes Film festival cost more than what I spend on my clothes in twenty years.
Floppy bows belong on secretaries in stuffy offices who wear culottes and glasses on chains. Not on Madonna!
That outfit is way not attractive on her. Those romper onesies with crotch snaps are for two year olds in diapers.